Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

As it happenedended1569361884

Boris Johnson news: PM forced to return early from UN as Corbyn demands election following Supreme Court humiliation

Follow all the latest developments

Boris Johnson says he 'strongly disagrees' with Supreme Court judgment

Boris Johnson is returning the UK to face urgent questions in parliament after the Supreme Court declared his government unlawfully shut it down for five weeks.

The prime minister was forced to cut short his trip to the UN General Assembly in New York to attend the House of Commons on Wednesday.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn called for Mr Johnson to “consider his position” following the landmark decision, while Lib Dem leader Jo Swinson said he was “not fit” to be PM.

Speaking in New York, the prime minister said his government will “respect” the court verdict and added that “of course parliament will come back”.

Downing Street confirmed that he had spoken to the Queen by phone but refused to say whether he had apologised for advising her to prorogue parliament.

It was also reported that Jacob Rees-Mogg, the leader of the House, had described the ruling as a “constitutional coup”.

See below for our coverage of events as they happened

1569313850

Business secretary Andrea Leadsom has been speaking about the Supreme Court case.

Asked if Boris Johnson should resign if he loses the ruling, the minister said: “I’m not prejudging the decision by the (court), I think it is absolutely vital that we wait to see what they say.”

“As I was leader of the Commons for two years, I can absolutely assure you we had the longest session in over 400 years, it’s absolutely vital that we prorogue, that we have a new Queen's speech, that we set out our new domestic agenda.”

Asked about another possible prorogation, she added: “That will be a matter for the prime minister, but I'm not speculating.

“It’s my expectation that the judges will find that prorogation is indeed a political matter and that in the longest parliamentary session in over 400 years, it’s perfectly reasonable to decide to prorogue and to set out a new domestic legislative programme.”

Asked if the allegations of a conflict of interest centring on the PM’s association with Jennifer Arcuri should be investigated, Leadsom said: “The prime minister has said he’s acted with propriety at all times and I’m happy with that.”

She told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “If there needs to be an investigation then I'm sure that there will be, but I’m comfortable with the prime minister’s assurances.”

Adam Forrest24 September 2019 09:30
1569314265

Adam Forrest24 September 2019 09:37
1569315090

Gina Miller is among the early arrivals at the Supreme Court for the verdict on the prorogation of parliament.

Adam Forrest24 September 2019 09:51
1569315834

Protesters – both pro and anti-Brexit – have begun to gather in the rain outside the Supreme Court awaiting this morning’s historic ruling.

Some activists opposed to prorogation outside the court (AP) 

Adam Forrest24 September 2019 10:03
1569316508

Our home affairs correspondent Lizzie Dearden is in the Supreme Court this morning, and will be reporting live on the verdict – expected at around 10.30am.

Adam Forrest24 September 2019 10:15
1569317295

Adam Forrest24 September 2019 10:28
1569317753

Lady Hale is now summarising the whole case ahead of delivering the Supreme Court verdict on the suspension of parliament.

Lady Hale delivers Supreme Court verdict (UK Supreme Court) 

Adam Forrest24 September 2019 10:35
1569317818

Lady Hale says all 11 judges were unanimous in deciding that the case is “justiciable”, so the government loses that part of the argument.

Adam Forrest24 September 2019 10:36
1569318385

BREAKING: Supreme Court decides suspension of parliament was unlawful.

Adam Forrest24 September 2019 10:46
1569318477

Lady Hale said: “The court is bound to conclude therefore that the decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions.”

Adam Forrest24 September 2019 10:47

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in