Letter: Life assurance

Mr S. M. Kinnis
Wednesday 20 January 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Sir: The response from elements of the life-assurance industry to the Securities and Investments Board's proposal to broaden the constitution of self-regulatory boards by including non-industry representatives (14 January) is entirely predictable.

Self-regulation, in terms of the financial-services industry, has been a dismal failure and the incestuous make-up of regulatory boards and committees has been a major contributory factor. This attempt to police the life-assurance industry by its own practitioners has produced an environment that is characterised by cynicism, self-interest and a determination to maintain the status quo.

The long-suffering public would benefit enormously from the abandonment of self-regulation but, as an interim step, the breaking of the 'self-preservation society' syndrome would be welcome. It is to be hoped that the involvement and contribution of public-interest representatives would ensure that, for the first time, the life-assurance industry is forced to take account of what the public wants and to respond accordingly.

Yours faithfully,

S. M. KINNIS

Marketing Director

The Equitable Life Assurance Society

Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in