Reports RAF ‘ordered to shoot down Russian jets’ prompts Moscow demands for meeting
The claims are described as "inaccurate" by the Foreign Office
Russia summoned Britain’s military attache to explain reports RAF pilots had been given approval to shoot down Russian warplanes in the Middle East, the Foreign Office has said.
An “official explanation” was asked to be provided following reports that RAF Tornado fighters in Iraq had been fitted with missiles designed for aerial combat.
The Russian ambassador in London, Alexander Yakovenko, said he “urgently requested explanations” from the Foreign Office, according to The Times.
The reports have been described by the Foreign Office as “inaccurate”.
Britain’s Moscow defence attache met the Russian Ministry of Defence on Sunday and emphasised the UK’s concerns about Russian military involvement in Syria.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has deployed troops and aircraft to Syria to attack rebels attempting to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in the country’s civil war, which has lasted for nearly five years.
Recently, Russian jets have carried out strikes against targets in Syria, which the Kremlin has said are designed to destroy Isis.
However, the West has claimed other groups opposed to Syrian President Bashar Assad are also being hit.
A Foreign Office spokesman said: “The Russian government sought clarification over inaccurate newspaper reports concerning the RAF rules of engagement in Iraq.
“The defence attache reiterated the British government’s concerns about Russia’s military operation in Syria, including targeting legitimate opposition groups, using unguided weaponry and leading to large numbers of civilian deaths.”
Additional reporting by Associated Press
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies