Will the health and social care secretary, Matt Hancock, hit his target of 100,000 tests for coronavirus by the end of the month? Was it wise? Does it matter?

When, on 2 April, Mr Hancock, after much media pressure, unveiled his ambitious goal to take coronavirus testing from around 10,000 a day to 10 times that figure, he created a remarkable statistical rod for his own back. He did not have to do it, despite the poor reviews the government was receiving for its failures on testing. Yet he did so, by his own witness, to discipline himself to strain every sinew to get there, and to galvanise the entire machinery of the state, including the army.

In due course a “testing tsar”, Professor John Newton, was appointed, and has expressed confidence that the target will indeed be met. One cabinet minister, George Eustice, has said that the capacity for 100,000 tests a day is already in place. Another, Dominic Raab, has downgraded the target to an “aspiration”. Now, new drive-in centres have been announced, postal testing and web bookings opened up, and eligibility for testing has been widened to all key staff and people over 65. The actual number of tests taken remains far behind the goal. There is something of a pattern of successive failures on testing to be answered by the unveiling of ever more ambitious new targets. As a media strategy it has had some success.

Download the new Independent Premium app

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

Comments

Share your thoughts and debate the big issues

Learn more
Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
  • You may not agree with our views, or other users’, but please respond to them respectfully
  • Swearing, personal abuse, racism, sexism, homophobia and other discriminatory or inciteful language is not acceptable
  • Do not impersonate other users or reveal private information about third parties
  • We reserve the right to delete inappropriate posts and ban offending users without notification

You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.

Create a commenting name to join the debate

Please try again, the name must be unique Only letters and numbers accepted
Loading comments...
Loading comments...
Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
  • You may not agree with our views, or other users’, but please respond to them respectfully
  • Swearing, personal abuse, racism, sexism, homophobia and other discriminatory or inciteful language is not acceptable
  • Do not impersonate other users or reveal private information about third parties
  • We reserve the right to delete inappropriate posts and ban offending users without notification

You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.

Loading comments...
Loading comments...